Friday, March 11, 2005

A Third Way

EI [Ecumenical Institute] was a radical approach to the gospels that was not a conservative literalism but also was not a liberal humanism either. Both the Right and the Left were left behind. The unique thing is that RS-I [Religious Studies I] opened the door to a way of being even more fundamental than the fundamentalists without a literal interpretation of scripture and at the same time more socially radical than the liberal social gospel. . . . The split into two nations between secularists and religionists is a spiritual rift between two fundamentalists. The tragedy is that true spirituality and healing is not found in either of these two approaches to viewing the world. . . . What is needed is the third way, the way of the secular-religious. ~Douglas Druckenmiller

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Third Way is definitely a concept I can grasp from my own philosophical foundations, but certainly not one I have any depth of understanding in comparison to the lifetime you have pursued following a Third Way.

I was right with you on this blog, right up to the last sentence, the last word, "secular-religious". Secular in my philosophical universe equals the ways of this world and is contrary to what I believe Jesus has taught me. Yet, at the same time I cling fiercely to the secular. Maybe we need a Third Word.

Anonymous said...

In the time when the New Testament was written there was no distinction between the secular and religious. The hyphenated word does not quite do it for me either, but maybe it points to our coming into a new time when again the distinction between the two is at least blurred.

click to subscribe to this site